Monday, July 18, 2016

The Unrehearsed Shakespeare Project - Guest Post by Marceau Deschamps-Ségura

Here is Marceau Deschamps-Ségura's follow up blog post to his earlier 'A Most Expected Journey (to Shakespeare!)' about his time visiting Pittsburgh (from Paris) and working with Elizabeth Ruelas & Andy Kirtland of The New Renaissance Theatre Company's Unrehearsed Shakespeare Project.  Marceau took part in our Unrehearsed Cue Script Technique two-day workshop with the rest of our cast and had text sessions with each of the directors - all as part of his PhD Studies at Université de Poitiers. 


           This time with Elizabeth Ruelas and Andy Kirtland was a great pleasure, and I think I learned a lot working with them. The first thing that struck me was the way they manage to build a team within the very short time of the workshop (only two days!). Almost all of us were meeting for the first time, and they now are going to perform the two plays this month, with no more rehearsals together than fight rehearsal. That capacity of team-building is very precious for that kind of form which aims to go very deep very fast: deep into Shakespeare’s words, deep into theatre, and deep into each of the actors. I am more used to long rehearsal periods or of group work, and that kind of hurry was very refreshing and life-affirming! Yes, we can do great things in just a short time! And Shakespeare might be a great example to have in mind for that!

            The way Elizabeth Ruelas and Andy Kirtland directed us was very interesting for me, too. We had both a lot of work and a lot of fun. They managed all the time to be friendly and firm. They made it very precise what we were working on, and how much time we would have for that, but they would smoothly change their plan if they saw that any of us would need it, so I had the feeling we were taking our time despite the swiftness. They were really driving us to the places they wanted to, but in the same time paid a lot attention to each of us during the process. I hope I will take the benefits of that experience, as a director.

            Concerning the Cue Script Technique itself, the experience overcame the theory of it. The feeling, as an actor, to be on stage, looking for my cue, and paying attention in the same time to the movements, the stage directions given by the text, is an essential part of acting, for me. It increases the attention the actor pays to both the text – its details, how it works, and how to make it obvious and thrilling for the audience – and the stage, that is to say the space, one’s own place, and the relationship to the other actors and the audience. Most of the qualities necessary to improvise are there and make the play very vivid, build the actors’ and the audience’s pleasure; those qualities meet the qualities of text-theatre, with the secure presence of a great author’s words and story to help them to elaborate a great moment. Indeed, the Cue Script Technique makes it understandable how Shakespeare’s plays came to be so efficient, in spite of their complexity, and with such a little time of common rehearsal – if any – they had. It is now obvious for me that I couldn’t set, nor read, an Elizabethan play without paying a great attention to those points we worked on: each actor’s having only his own part; the cues, and the author would use false or repeated cues to trick the actors, and make them feel as the characters do; suiting the Action to the Word and the Word to the Action; the way the verse is used to understand the emotional state of the character, thanks to irregularities in the number of beats; how the actors crossing the stage and addressing directly to the audience makes the action lively and clear; the information the First Folios might give about the pronunciation and action. During the text sessions, all of those points were made very clear, as well as the plenty of puns and references Shakespeare would spread in his plays, and that Elizabeth Ruelas and Andy Kirtland were qualified to explain. Moreover, these two directors would give us the tools and methods to plainly understand our roles, in order to perform it with pleasure and matter; each of them having his and her own personal approach of Shakespeare through these common rules. Eventually, the main thing I will retain from that experience, is that to enable the audience to get the complexity of Shakespeare’s texts, their subtle or trivial puns and simple or tangled story-lines, the first thing to do is to make those plays as entertaining as they used to be. And that can be an efficient way to do it thanks to all of those rules and codes that would be used at the moment they were written, just as Elizabeth Ruelas and Andy Kirtland do with the New Renaissance Theatre Company and the Unrehearsed Shakespeare Project – bringing in their own point of view, humour and fantasy.

 
- Compte-rendu de Marceau Deschamps-Ségura

Sunday, June 26, 2016

Part Two of The Teaching, the Directing, the Passion

Here is the continuation of my first blog post ‘The Teaching, the Directing, the Passion' about my recent studies at Shakespeare’s Globe Directing Masterclasses.  I took pages of notes, but wanted to distil them all into a one paragraph summary for each of the two days of classes.  Although this post is brief, I hope it will inspire you to keep learning about whatever subject thrills you.  As Albert Einstein said: ‘Once you stop learning, you start dying.’
 
Day 2, Sunday:
Today mostly took place in Sackler Studios (as did some of Day 1) as well as in the Sam Wanamaker Playhouse.  Our first class of the day was with Sarah Case for ‘Voice.’  This lovely woman led us through some vocal exercises and helped to integrate the importance of breath and voice.  One of my favorite quotes from Ms. Case was ‘Breath is everything - it drives the voice.  Without breath you have no voice.’  This is so important in Shakespeare.  There are many long thoughts and some difficult passages, so if your diaphragm isn’t properly supported – you won’t be able to give them justice.  We also got to ‘Breath the Space’ in the playhouse, which was making sounds and saying lines from various places around the space.  This is a very good exercise for getting actors to work together as a company, which is precisely what we want to achieve with our ensemble at The New Renaissance Theatre Company.  Too soon, it was time for lunch, and I wish this session could have gone on for a bit longer, of course.  After lunch, we met with Simone Coxall for ‘Movement in Theatre’, which was amazing!  For the classes this weekend, we focused on The Tempest Act 1 Scene II.  Ms. Coxall helped us to get grounded to the floor and used the brilliant analogy of imagining ‘roots growing from our feet into the floor.’  We did a lot of exercises to help us delve into the three main characters of the scene: Prospero, Caliban and Ariel.  Eventually, we used all of our work from the beginning of the class to bring the text to life.  I have such a problem getting out of my head, but Ms. Coxall inspired me to have fun and to ‘not be afraid to fail.’  This class split its time between the studios and the playhouse like the Voice class, as well.  In the playhouse, we really got to explore movement as the three characters on the stage – using every bit.  She also taught us to ‘not play the obstacle, but do what you need to do to overcome it.’  Towards the end of our session, I even got to portray Prospero in a bit of movement work with a fellow classmate as Caliban.  It was so much fun to play! 

Finally, class was over (sadly) and we all met with Rob Swain for ‘Plenary’ and to tell him what a wonderful experience this was for us.  I really hope I get the opportunity to work with them all again.  The Higher Education Team were so kind and helpful.  After some hugs and goodbyes, I zipped over to the line for Groundlings with my ticket for A Midsummer Night’s Dream in my hand.  This was Emma Rice’s first production as The Shakespeare’s Globe new Artistic Director.  I wasn’t going to miss that!

-Elizabeth Ruelas, Artistic Director of The New Renaissance Theatre Company (which produces The Unrehearsed Shakespeare Project)
 
Pictured below: My traveling companion Balzac near the entrance to The Globe Theatre & Sackler Studios
 
 

Monday, May 23, 2016

The Teaching, the Directing, the Passion

I recently had the extremely good fortune to be ‘hand-picked’ to take Directing Masterclasses at Shakespeare’s Globe in London.  I met such brilliant, warm, wonderful people in my instructors and my fellow classmates.  It’s reignited my passion for directing and teaching so much that I want more!  So, here is just a very tiny bit of how my too brief weekend of Globe classes went:

Day 1, Saturday:
Introductions with Rob Swain brought us into the beautiful Sam Wanamaker Playhouse where I pulled out my notebook to begin taking notes.  The lovely actor Dickon Tyrrell was our instructor for ‘An Actor’s Perspective’ where he told us what it was like playing in this beautiful space as well as in the Globe theatre.  He said the mistake an actor could make in the indoor playhouse was ‘going too intimate’ and that actors should ‘play it like you’re in the Globe’.  Then we were given an extensive tour of the playhouse from Hell to the Heavens!  I couldn’t agree more with Mr. Tyrrell’s advice about how ‘Shakespeare is the director’ and that there is ‘no generalized emotion in Shakespeare’.  As a Historically Informed Practice director myself, these are the same things I tell my actors, as well as my students in the workshops that I teach.  Then we met with director Jacqui Somerville for ‘A Director Prepares,’ who taught us about how important a support system is.  I couldn’t agree more.  We also learned Ms. Somerville’s process for her preparation and research and how she works with directors.  One of my favorite things that she said was: ‘Don’t spoon-feed actors. Empower them.’  So inspirational!
After lunch, we met with Simon Dormandy for our ‘Text and Language’ course.  Such a fun discussion with my fellow Shakespeareans!  One of my favorite quotes from Mr. Dormandy was ‘If it’s difficult to say, don’t make it easy.’  Going back to what Mr. Tyrrell said earlier in the day about how ‘Shakespeare is the director’:  Shakespeare puts the character in the language.  If your character is given a difficult line to say – there’s a reason for it.  Perhaps your character is confused, conflicted or not sure about what he/she is saying.  Don’t try to ‘fix’ the line.  Just say it and see what happens.  Then we got into text and pauses and got to get on our feet to work on lines.  I was fortunate to read a bit of Olivia from Twelfth Night aloud using what we had learned. 

Before we knew it, class was over.  But all of us directing students wanted more. Shakespeare and directing is our passion!  Being able to learn from some of the best practitioners around was such a blessing and I wish (as did we all) it could have been longer.  Luckily, there was one more day of learning, which I’ll write about in my next blog post: ‘The Teaching, the Directing, the Passion Part II.’
Stay tuned!

-Elizabeth Ruelas, Artistic Director of The New Renaissance Theatre Company

PS: Attached are a couple of photos of my trip with my travelling companion Balzac (who you may remember from Andy Kirtland’s blog post last year: ‘A Labour of Love, or There and Back Again’) with more photos & my tweets during the weekend via #EtoGlobe.












Friday, April 22, 2016

A most expected journey (to Shakespeare!) - Guest Post by Marceau Deschamps-Ségura

This month's post is by Marceau Deschamps-Ségura, who is visiting us from Paris, France to attend our upcoming Unrehearsed Cue Script Technique with our tour cast as part of his PhD studies at Université de Poitiers:

I first met Andy Kirtland and his work with Elizabeth Ruelas on Shakespeare during a lecture day about Love's Labour's Lost at the École Normale Supérieure in Lyon. He presented the Unrehearsed Cue Script technique, and what it revealed about the play.
The interest of their work immediately struck me: using what we know about Shakespeare and its original practices seem to me a great way to find out some secrets of his texts, in order to make them efficient and powerful onstage. Andy's exposé clearly showed how the actor was informed by the stage situation and action, and how Shakespeare used the codes and practices of his own time to increase his actors' presence.
As an actor, I am very curious to experience that way to perform the text, to play with it, and to find out the clues Shakespeare left in the actors' parts to trick or help them. I am curious of the awareness, the calm and the truth it seems to demand to the actors, and that I am trying to develop each day.
As a young director, in our artistic and economical context, I really look forward exploring a different way to think about the theatrical process. Indeed, putting the focus on the stage situations, the relationship between the actors and with the audience, keeping very attentive to the here and now so as to play with it, all of these things appear to me as main qualities for an actor to have, which make the great quality of a play, and the pleasure of its audience. Moreover, I like the efficiency it implies about theatrical process: the actors are always playing, creating, exploring, from the first time they meet until the end of the tour. It's not about preparing something to give to the audience, but properly creating something singular and unique, directly under their eyes and thanks to their reactions. The whole path of creation is worth being shared, and it is interesting sharing it from its first days. I love the dream-come-true aspect of directly performing a play, in a brand new place, with brand new actors and brand new audience, without the usual inertia we often think necessary.
As a dramaturge and a PhD student, I am impatient to witness and experience on my own a historically informed technique which, I don't doubt it, will help me understand Shakespeare's plays patterns, mechanisms, atmosphere and spirit, and to make it echo with my own research about its original practices and contemporary adaptations. It is such a pleasure to me when the works of the scholars escape from their books to rush on the stage, and when the experiments of artists contribute to the reflection about what has been done and what can be done!

At last, I am really impatient to meet a couple of passionate, demanding and popular artists and their team, trying to bring to everybody a "new" way to hear those plays, as lively and frolic as they might have been, four centuries ago.


-Marceau Deschamps-Ségura
 

Tuesday, March 22, 2016

Father Figures in Romeo and Juliet - Lord Capulet

What follows is a second part of a larger piece that I am working on regarding the roles of the parents in The Tragedie of Romeo and Juliet. Earlier I looked at the role of Prince Eskales as a possibly fatherless father figure. Here we will take a look at the strongest of the patriarchs depicted in the play, and see how his role effects the tragedy of the young star-crossed lovers.


--------



The Capulets are probably the best-illustrated family unit in the entirety of Shakespeare’s theatrical canon. We have scenes between the parents and child. We see intercessions by the household servants who are like family. There is a variety to this family that makes them human, if not entirely likable. How then does this environment contribute to the tragedy of the play?



Lord Capulet speaks the first line almost every time that he enters the scene. He comes on speaking which puts the attention on him. When the Prince speaks privately to the fathers after the opening brawl, he takes Capulet away with him first. Paris, the Prince’s kinsman is wooing Capulet’s daughter. Capulet holds a feast. Capulet’s family has a large crypt. In the context of the play the Capulet family is given importance over the Montagues. The first words in the play are given to the Capulets. Lord Capulet is the strong, authoritative father figure in this tragedy.



The character is not drawn as a bad father. He protects his family. When the audience discovers that the Countie Paris wishes to marry Juliet, we first see Lord Capulet putting him off, telling him to wait because she is too young. At his great feast, he speaks well of the party-crashing Romeo, the son of his great rival and is able to keep the peace when Tibalt demands satisfaction for this insult. It is only when Tibalt is murdered that Capulet begins to force the marriage on his only living child in order to ensure her safety and the family’s prosperity, making him appear a monster in the eyes of his daughter, and a villain in the hearts of the audience.



‘Mountague is bound as well as I, / In penalty alike, and 'tis not hard I thinke, / For men so old as wee, to keepe the peace,’ he states. There is an acknowledgment of his role as a leader, due to his age and authority. However, he quickly tempers this authority with a father’s care for his daughter: ‘But wooe her gentle Paris, get her heart, / My will to her consent, is but a part, / And shee agree, within her scope of choise, / Lyes my consent, and faire according voice.’ He does not treat Juliet as chattel, and shows true care and tenderness in these lines regarding the dispensation of his daughter.



The first time we are given any exchange between Lord and Lady Capulet is after Tibalt’s death when Lord Capulet does an about-face and agrees to quickly marry Juliet off to Paris. He sends his wife to their daughter to make the case. Herein we have a glimpse as to why this concerned father is made out as the baddie in this youthful love story. This is the first time we see Juliet and her father interacting, and he cannot understand why his daughter is not agreeable to his plans. Of course, she is unaware of how he has been protecting her up to this point.



How, will she none? doth she not give us thanks?

Is she not proud? doth she not count her blest,

Unworthy as she is, that we have wrought

So worthy a Gentleman, to be her Bridegroome



…………………………………………………………………is meant Love.

How now?

How now? Chopt Logicke? what is this?



[…]



Gods bread, it makes me mad:

Day, night, houre, ride, time, worke, play,

Alone in companie, still my care hath bin

To have her matcht, and having now provided

A Gentleman of Noble Parentage,

Of faire Demeanes, Youthfull, and Nobly Allied,

Stuft as they say with Honourable parts,

Proportion'd as ones thought would wish a man,

And then to have a wretched puling foole,

A whining mammet, in her Fortunes tender,

To answer, Ile not wed, I cannot Love:

I am too young, I pray you pardon me.

                       

Here is much abuse thrown at Juliet by her father. He calls her ‘green sickness,’ ‘carrion,’ ‘baggage,’ ‘tallow face,’ ‘disobedient wretch,’ ‘wretched puling foole’ and ‘whining mammet.’ He threatens her: ‘I will drag thee, on a Hurdle thither,’ ‘My fingers itch,’ ‘you shall not house with me,’ ‘Ile nere acknowledge thee.’ His authority is lost with these insults and threats, showing instead a father whose work for his child is unappreciated. In his eyes, Juliet has no idea what machinations he has been dealing with on her behalf. Perhaps it is the very fact that he has been working without her knowledge that has put this rift between them. In Capulet’s next scene, this rift seems to be closed.



How now my headstrong,

Where have you bin gadding?



…………………………………………………………………rul'd by you.

Send for the Countie, goe tell him of this,

Ile have this knot knit up to morrow morning.



…………………………………………………………………bounds of modestie.

Why I am glad on't, this is well, stand up,

This is as't should be, let me see the County:

I marrie go I say, and fetch him hither.

Now afore God, this reveren'd holy Frier,

All our whole Cittie is much bound to him.



…………………………………………………………………there's time inough.

Go Nurse, go with her,

Weele to Church to morrow.



…………………………………………………………………now neere night.

Tush, I will stirre about,

And all things shall be well, I warrant thee wife:

Go thou to Juliet, helpe to decke up her,

Ile not to bed to night, let me alone:

Ile play the huswife for this once. What ho?

They are all forth, well I will walke my selfe

To Countie Paris, to prepare him up

Against to morrow, my heart is wondrous light,

Since this same way-ward Gyrle is so reclaim'd.



The cues here, ‘rul’d by you’ and ‘bounds of modestie,’ combined with Capulet’s responses show that Juliet has come to her senses and that as far as he is concerned, ‘This is as't should be.’ He is so happy that he offers to stay up worrying: ‘Ile not to bed to night, let me alone: / Ile play the huswife for this once.’ Having completed his duties has a father, he will now take on the role of the mother.



However, this joy is short-lived. After a few small exchanges, Capulet’s cue lines tell him all he needs to know:



…………………………………………………………………helpe, call helpe.

…………………………………………………………………shee's dead.

…………………………………………………………………O wofull time.



The death of his daughter throws him into despair, and he grieves, for his child.



Death that hath tane her hence to make me waile,

Ties up my tongue, and will not let me speake.



[…]



O Child, O Child; my soule, and not my Child,

Dead art thou, alacke my Child is dead,

And with my Child, my joyes are buried.



In his grief he does not look for solace with his wife. His lines are given to unspecified persons, or directed to his thwarted son-in-law, Paris. At this most painful time for him, the death of his daughter (of course, we in the audience have satisfaction that Juliet is not dead, and at the same time, the knowledge that she does not see this honest tenderness that her father expresses for her: another instance of the tragedy of miscommunication between father and daughter), he is alone in his suffering.



In the play’s final scene, Capulet makes several references to family. He refers to his own family by their relationship to himself, again calling Lady Capulet ‘wife’ and referring to ‘our Daughter’ and ‘my Daughter[ ]’ rather than using their names. Then surprisingly he refers to ‘Brother Montague.’ Now, with the death of both of their children, they can be brothers. They are of one generation and can understand each other.



By eventually forcing the issue of Juliet’s marriage to Paris, Lord Capulet pushes the tragedy along its path. Had he continued with the compassionate care of his daughter, letting her choose whom she liked, he still may not have allowed the marriage of Romeo and Juliet to continue, but we can only speculate on alternate endings. What is clear through the text is that there is very little meaningful communication between father and daughter in the Capulet household, a strengthening of which may have avoided quite a bit of bloodshed.



-----



As work continues on the prompt book and through text sessions with the cast of The Tragedie of Romeo and Juliet for NRTC’s upcoming production as part of our Unrehearsed Shakespeare Project’s 2016 tour, more will be unearthed regarding the parents and parental figures in the play and how the generation gap effects the course of the play.

-Andy Kirtland, Managing Director of The New Renaissance Theatre Company (which produces The Unrehearsed Shakespeare Project)



Monday, February 15, 2016

Our Midsommer Nights with Romeo and Juliet

Much like last year’s post Much adoe and Me, this post is about why A Midsommer Nights Dreame and The Tragedie of Romeo and Juliet (First Folio spellings) were chosen for our Unrehearsed Shakespeare Project tour this year.  To begin with, both of these plays are perfect demonstrations of almost everything the Unrehearsed Cue Script Technique offers from blocking directions to simultaneous dialogue clues.  MSND, aside from being my favorite of Shakespeare’s comedies, has countless examples of how this technique shows the audience what the characters really think about each other even though they are saying the opposite.  Using just the rules of Unrehearsed brings the Demetrius & Helena ‘follow me no more’ scene to hilarious life when the actors follow the technique’s rules of crossing.  And the play within a play scene never fails to entertain when the actors stay true to the text and do exactly as Shakespeare has written!  I don’t want to give too much away, but I’ve seen so many productions of MSND where the director feels that he/she needs to ‘add’ superfluous actions and props to make this scene funny.  It doesn’t need it.  Just stay true the text and you’re golden!  Finally, as the director of MSND, I got to do one of my favorite doublings, which is to combine the lovers, mechanicals and fairies into just four tracks.  I put together this doubling the last time I directed MSND, which adds a bit more excitement and fun for our cast as well as the audience – who get to see our versatile actors switch characters with the snap of a finger.  With the usual doubling of Puck & Philostrate, Theseus & Oberon, Hippolyta & Titania, and Egeus & Quince (Bottom has no doubling), this rounds out my cast to 9 actors onstage and 1 prompting.

As for Romeo & Juliet, that was a bit of a happy accident.  We wanted to do two plays this year and needed one that would be a dramatic contrast to MSND – while still sharing some of the same romantically tragic elements of how love (or the lack of it) affects people.  Plus, this would be an opportunity for people to see a well-known story presented in a new way, which will be illuminating in ways that more traditional productions, movies or merely reading the script are not.  Romeo & Juliet was written around the same time as MSND, and Andy Kirtland (the director) initially thought it could be performed using just 10 actors, as well (9 performing and 1 prompting).  However, after many nights of hair-pulling research, he discovered that this play does indeed need 11 people.  This is where our Apprentice idea came from, and we are thrilled to be bringing in someone to take over a track of roles for R & J as well as assist our awesome stage manager in MSND.  R & J also has that wonderful simultaneous dialogue in certain parts, if you use the Unrehearsed Cue Script Technique.  These dramatic moments of confusion and characters talking over each other are thrilling and are rarely (if ever) seen in performances!  On a personal note, R & J was the first Shakespeare play I ever read and acted in.  Even though I had a very small part as a dancer in that university production, years later it would be one of my first Unrehearsed Cue Script Technique shows with The New England Shakespeare Festival – in which I played Mercutio.

As with all of our Unrehearsed Shakespeare Project shows, each of our actors have taken on 2 or 3 tracks, which we switch around for each performance.  So, audience members who attend on multiple days will never see the exact same show twice!  Watching an Unrehearsed Cue Script Technique production brings Shakespeare’s plays to life in ways that people don’t usually get to see.  Our theatre company cares about the story and staying true to the text, which comes through in the high quality performances and audience reaction.  I am thrilled to be bringing our 3rd year’s tour to Allegheny Parks again and look forward to bringing our fun and energetic shows there for many years to come.

-Elizabeth Ruelas, Artistic Director of The New Renaissance Theatre Company (which produces The Unrehearsed Shakespeare Project)
 

Wednesday, January 13, 2016

The Prince's Daddy Issues in The Tragedie of Romeo and Juliet

At this time of year as we find ourselves preparing for our upcoming Unrehearsed Shakespeare Project’s tour of A Midsommer Night’s Dreame and The Tragedie of Romeo and Juliet, I find myself up to the elbows in cue scripts as I prepare and format the texts. When working on the texts in parts this way, themes and words make themselves known in different ways. This time, working on Romeo and Juliet, I have been struck by the roles of the parents. The following is part of a longer essay, still being composed, that will explore the parental relationships in The Tragedie of Romeo and Juliet as seen through the text of the First Folio and the cue scripts for the characters involved.

After pointing out some differences in the title pages of the quartos preceding the publication of the First Folio, I point to one specific variation. One of the Prince’s lines, commonly printed as ‘To know our farther pleasure in this case,’ appears in the First Folio as ‘To know our Fathers pleasure in this case’ (emphasis mine). The following are my musings on the implications of this word choice when exploring the roles of parent’s in The Tragedie of Romeo and Juliet. 






In his first appearance, The Prince has only one speech in which he brings a brawl to an end:

Rebellious Subjects, Enemies to peace,
Prophaners of this Neighbor-stained Steele,
Will they not heare? What hoe, you Men, you Beasts,
That quench the fire of your pernitious Rage,
With purple Fountaines issuing from your Veines:
On paine of Torture, from those bloody hands
Throw your mistemper'd Weapons to the ground,
And heare the Sentence of your mooved Prince.
Three civill Broyles, bred of an Ayery word,
By thee old Capulet and Mountague,
Have thrice disturb'd the quiet of our streets,
And made Verona's ancient Citizens
Cast by their Grave beseeming Ornaments,
To wield old Partizans, in hands as old,
Cankred with peace, to part your Cankred hate,
If ever you disturbe our streets againe,
Your lives shall pay the forfeit of the peace.
For this time all the rest depart away:
You Capulet shall goe along with me,
And Mountague come you this afternoone,
To know our Fathers pleasure in this case:
To old Free-towne, our common judgement place:
Once more on paine of death, all men depart.

It takes the Prince 8 lines of text before the fighting ceases, and he can get a word in edgeways. His cue to enter is ‘seek a Foe.’ This gives the actor entering the idea that he is already entering a situation looking for an adversary, not to take control. He speaks of ‘Three civill Broyles, bred of an Ayery word.’ If his power is so respected, such slights would not break out into violence, but rather the fear of repercussions would keep the citizens in line. He must tell everyone to leave twice: ‘For this time all the rest depart away:’ then again 5 lines later, ‘Once more on paine of death, all men depart.’ This could be seen as 2 stage directions, the first to the citizens who have come to join the fight, and the second to the remaining heads of the family. It is within these five lines that the Prince speaks of his ‘Father’s pleasure.’ Possibly, he wanted the common citizens to disperse, and not hear that he must take this case to a higher authority, his Father. It is possible that everyone is aware of his weakness as a ruler, and therefore, ignores the order. At the end of these lines, still all men do not depart. Montague, Lady Montague and Benvolio remain on stage. Yes, this device keeps the plot and action moving along (and rightly so), but we could have another introducing Romeo after everyone had left the stage. By keeping some players on stage, the weakness of the Prince’s position is pushed farther.

Several references are made to age in his first speech: ‘old Capulet and Montague,’ ‘auncient Citizens,’ the double entendre of ‘Grave beseeming Ornaments’ and ‘hands as old.’ These men, or this situation at least, seem to have some seniority to the Prince. The reference to his Father also refers to an older authority. This opens up the possibility that the Prince is young himself, and offers an explanation for his weakness. The ending’s inevitability is presaged by the fact that a world in which the generations do not listen to one another is overseen by a youthful figure who does not command the authority necessary to keep order and peace.

The next time we see the Prince, we see the result of his weak leadership. He enters following the two fights that end with the deaths of Mercutio and Tibalt. His cue script for this scene is as follows:

 
…………………………………………………………………dost thou stay?
ENTER PRINCE, OLD MONTAGUE, CAPULET, THEIR WIVES
[51]
Where are the vile beginners of this Fray?

…………………………………………………………………O Cozin, Cozin.
Benvolio, who began this Fray?

…………………………………………………………………must not live.
Romeo slew him, he slew Mercutio,
Who now the price of his deare blood doth owe.

…………………………………………………………………life of Tybalt.
And for that offence,
Immediately we doe exile him hence:
I have an interest in your hearts proceeding:
My bloud for your rude brawles doth lie a bleeding.
But Ile Amerce you with so strong a fine,
That you shall all repent the losse of mine.
It will be deafe to pleading and excuses,
Nor teares, nor prayers shall purchase our abuses.
Therefore use none, let Romeo hence in hast,
Else when he is found, that houre is his last.
Beare hence his body, and attend our will:
Mercy not Murders, pardoning those that kill.

EXEUNT

Upon his arrival, he has to repeat himself. This is never a good beginning to a person supposedly in a position of power. The full text of these first exchanges looks like this: 

Prince                     Where are the vile beginners of this Fray?

Benvolio                O Noble Prince, I can discover all
The unluckie Mannage of this fatall brall:
There lies the man slaine by young Romeo,
That slew thy kinsman brave Mercutio.

Capulet Wife        Tybalt, my Cozin? O my Brothers Child,
O Prince, O Cozin, Husband, O the blood is spild
Of my deare kinsman. Prince as thou art true,
For bloud of ours, shed bloud of Mountague.
O Cozin, Cozin.

Prince                     Benvolio, who began this Fray?

There is evidence here that the lines spoken by Benvolio and Lady Capulet are simultaneous and he is given a false cue to start speaking by Lady Capulet. He is being shouted at and interrupted. From the audience’s point of view, this makes thematic sense: Lady Capulet has just found her kinsman was murdered, and Benvolio is trying to protect his best friend. From a character point of view, this reinforces the Prince’s weakness.

When interceding in the large melee in the first scene, the Prince threatens ‘If ever you disturbe our streets againe, / Your lives shall pay the forfeit of the peace.’ Yet here, after the feud results in the death of his own kinsman, his sentence is exile for Romeo, and a stiff financial penalty for the Montagues and Capulets. He goes back on his word, where a penalty of death is called for he again shows what he believes to be mercy. This tactic does not work out well for him.

The third and final time that we see the Prince, he is summoned late at night to the Capulet family tomb.

…………………………………………………………………the Frier too.
ENTER THE PRINCE
[99]

What misadventure is so earely up,
That calls our person from our mornings rest?
 
…………………………………………………………………toward our Monument.
What feare is this which startles in your eares?

…………………………………………………………………and new kil'd.
Search,
Seeke, and know how, this foule murder comes.

…………………………………………………………………to a Sepulcher.
Come Mountague, for thou art early up
To see thy Sonne and Heire, now early downe.

…………………………………………………………………against my age?
Looke: and thou shalt see.

…………………………………………………………………to a grave?
Seale up the mouth of outrage for a while,
Till we can cleare these ambiguities,
And know their spring, their head, their true descent,
And then I will be generall of your woes,
And lead you even to death? meane time forbeare,
And let mischance be slave to patience,
Bring forth the parties of suspition.

…………………………………………………………………my selfe excus'd.
Then say at once, what thou dost know in this?

…………………………………………………………………of severest Law.
We still have knowne thee for a Holy man.
Where's Romeo's man? What can he say to this? 

…………………………………………………………………left him there.
Give me the Letter, I will look on it.
Where is the Counties Page that rais’d the Watch?                     
This Letter doth make good the Friers words,
Their course of Love, the tydings of her death:
And heere he writes, that he did buy a poison
Of a poore Pothecarie, and therewithal
Came to this Vault to dye, and lye with Juliet.
Where be these Enemies? Capulet, Mountague,
See what a scourge is laide upon your hate,
That Heaven finds meanes to kill your joyes with Love;
And I, for winking at your discords too,
Have lost a brace of Kinsmen: All are punish'd.

…………………………………………………………………of our enmity.
A glooming peace this morning with it brings,
The Sunne for sorrow will not shew his head;
Go hence, to have more talke of these sad things,
Some shall be pardon'd, and some punished.
For never was a Storie of more Wo,
Then this of Juliet, and her Romeo.

He comes on the scene to find the bodies of Romeo (whom he had exiled), Paris (another of his own kinsmen) and Juliet, freshly dead. There is, however, an acknowledgment of the role his weakness has played in the unfolding of the tragedy: ‘And I, for winking at your discords too, / Have lost a brace of Kinsmen: All are punish'd.’ Any reason for this weakness is only hinted at throughout the text.

However, once he discovers that the grudge between these families has resulted in death, and in an affront to his own family and authority, there is no more mention of age in the Prince’s text, and no further intimation of an absent Father. It could be said that the Prince does grow up.

The whereabouts and identity of the Prince’s Father, if he ever existed in the confines of the story, is never discussed. There is mention of the plague breaking out during the action of the play, but it never directly touches Verona. Was he afflicted? We do not know, and possibly should not even care. However, if this fleeting reference to an absent father (ruler) is significant to the over-arching theme of parents and their children, what does the Prince’s Father’s absence mean for, and say about, The Tragedie of Romeo and Juliet?

The absence means, that for whatever reason, the son is left in charge. The child is given authority. We are never told how old the Prince is. We know that Mercutio and Paris are his kinsmen. We know that he has spoken out harshly against the feud between the Montagues and Capulets. We know by his actions that he is not a consistent ruler. By his own admission, his rule has contributed to the tragedy of the play. This all possibly points to the fact that the Prince is not ready to be in charge. He cannot govern Verona (his symbolic children) because he is immature and not ready. Having an unprepared Prince in charge mirrors the actions of the more popular characters in the play, parents who cannot govern their children and the youths who are incapable of governing themselves.
 





The essay will go on to compare and contrast the Lords and Ladies Montague and Capulet, as well as exploring the surrogate parents, the Nurse and Friar Lawrence. Some other themes that have caught my interest while preparing this play have been communication, or lack thereof, and the importance of names. I look forward to putting more of my thoughts down and sharing them with all of you.

-Andy Kirtland, Managing Director of The New RenaissanceTheatre Company (which produces The Unrehearsed Shakespeare Project)