The Unrehearsed Shakespeare Project is currently based in
Pittsburgh, PA. We are dedicated
to performing and exploring the works of William Shakespeare using the
Unrehearsed Cue Script Technique that we learned from Demitra Papadinis at the
New England Shakespeare Festival, and influenced by the work of Patrick Tucker
and the Original Shakespeare Company.
When William Shakespeare composed his plays, the theatre was
popular entertainment. His plays were in direct competition with bear baiting,
gambling and brothels just up the street, and sometimes in the same
building. Live theatre had to
entertain, and offer something new everyday to keep people coming back. For this reason, Shakespeare’s company
and the others working in London at the time, presented a different play every day
(Sundays excluded), up to 12 different plays every two weeks, and hardly ever
repeated the same play two days in a row.
A new play was introduced into the repertoire about every two weeks, and
plays could go months without being repeated.
At the time performers did not receive entire copies of the
scripts they performed. This was
done for a myriad of economic and practical reasons. Copyright did not exist, and there was nothing keeping an
unhappy actor from taking his entire copy of Hamlet down the street and passing it off as his own. It also took Shakespeare and the
scribes at the Globe long enough to write Hamlet out longhand once, why take the time and expense to
do it for Guard #2? Paper and ink
were expensive and used sparingly.
Each actor only received his cue script (his ‘roll’) containing the last
three or four words of their cue line, their lines, their entrances and exits
and very important stage directions.
With a different play every day, theatres beginning to fill
a few hours before the performance and with limited daylight hours in which to
perform, when did Shakespeare’s actors have time to rehearse? They didn’t; at least not in the way we
perceive of it today. They would
take the time before the performance to practice any dances, fights or specific
bits of choreography and special effects, but there would not be time to run
through a play in its entirety. In
order that the actors would know how to stage themselves during the play, the
playwrights of the time would write directions and clues into the scripts.
Short lines, capital letters, variant spellings were all
clues for an actor. The
punctuation helped to form thoughts, point to inflections, and let an actor
know what was going on with his character. All of these devices are seen throughout the Folio and
Quarto printings of Shakespeare’s plays.
Many of these clues have been erased over the past 400 years in attempts
to regularize the text for a reading audience, and to make it clearer as
poetry. They have been seen as
printing house errors, or mistakes made from ‘foul copies’ and memorial
reconstructions of the plays.
While not every variant found in these early printings came directly
from William Shakespeare, they were at least made by his contemporaries, and in
practice are remarkably useful as clues for actors.
After hundreds of years of performance, it is obvious that
the works of William Shakespeare can be prepared and performed in any number
ways to a great deal of artistic and critical success. The Unrehearsed Cue Script Technique
that we employ is just that, a technique. It is not the only one out there, nor is it the only one
that we use in our careers as performers. But it is the lens through which we explore the works of
William Shakespeare, and it colors the opinions that will be expressed in this
blog.
We are not interested in creating museum pieces. This technique is used to create
connections to our modern audiences through working in a manner for which we
believe the text was originally written.
We are not interested in ‘authenticity.’ That term is too loose, and only serves to confuse the real
aim of any theatrical event, which is to entertain (on any number of
levels). The only thing that
matters is what happens in the space between the performers and the audience
through the craft of theatre. Not
what happened 400 years ago. That
is an academic endeavor, and we are embarking upon a practical one.
We are not interested in questions of authorship. One reason being that we have yet to
see any convincing argument that someone other than the actor / playwright
William Shakespeare (and his direct collaborators) wrote the plays. Our concern is with how a modern
audience encounters the text in performance, and its original intention takes a
back seat to the immediacy of the live event.
We are open to discussing Shakespeare, with all that his
name has become associated with in our modern culture. Our emphasis is on performance, since
that is why these texts were originally constructed. Most of all, we look forward to being an important
contributor to the conversation about Shakespeare in the modern world, and of
course, see you at one of our productions.
-Andy Kirtland
No comments:
Post a Comment